At South by Southwest this week I attended a program on patent reform featuring representatives from both sides in the “patent troll” debate. Though there was disagreement on the nature and extent of the problem, most of the panelists seemed receptive to proposed solutions such as making it harder to get patents issued, imposing stricter pleading requirements, regulating demand letter practices, or allowing fee-shifting to discourage meritless litigation. I wondered, however, whether increasing the size of the hurdles on the litigation track might in some cases only give parties new issues to litigate over. If the cost of litigation is what gives patent “trolls” leverage to demand settlements, then the solution might instead lie in reducing the cost of litigation. Maybe […]
Someone posted a question on an online forum about a divorce agreement reached after two days of mediation. The questioner’s ex-wife wanted to set the agreement aside because some stock options assigned to the husband in the settlement agreement had subsequently skyrocketed in value. The husband was looking for some ammunition that would allow him to retain the full value of these assets. (Almost the exact same situation can be found in the recent California Court of Appeal case of Lappe v. Lappe, No. B255704 (2d Dist. Dec. 19, 2014). In that case, the wife was seeking discovery of financial statements provided by the husband during the mediation, for the purpose of attempting to set aside the mediated property settlement […]
I will be a guest on the Doug Noll radio show on Thursday, February 19, 2015. The program is broadcast over the internet and its website can be found here. In case you miss the program Thursday night, however, I believe it will soon be available on the website. I expect to be talking about the business of mediation, how mediation may be transforming the civil justice system, and whatever else comes to mind. I’m looking forward to the opportunity. UPDATE (3/5/15): It appears the audio file was erased by the web radio station, so my interview is now lost to posterity. Doug promises that we will do another program soon however.
A recent artical in the ABA Journal on movements to license legal technicians to perform limited legal services cited a Bar Foundation study showing that most people encountering what the study called “civil justice situations” either handled the situation themselves, did nothing about it, or enlisted the help of friends and family. Only about 22% sought the assistance of people outside their social network. Naturally the ABA article viewed this situation as a potential opportunity for the legal profession to meet unmet legal needs, while questioning whether opening up opportunities for paralegals or other non-lawyers to serve these needs should be allowed. To me, however, data like that found in this study suggests that the traditional justice system is either […]